Revising and Resubmitting: Responding to Reviewer Comments

Revising and Resubmitting: Responding to Reviewer Comments illustration

Received a revise and resubmit decision? Learn how to respond to reviewer comments effectively and strengthen your manuscript for resubmission.

A "revise and resubmit" decision is not a rejection — it is an invitation. The journal sees potential in your research and wants you to address concerns before acceptance. How you respond to reviewer comments can determine the outcome.

This guide explains how to approach revision and respond to reviewers effectively.

Read All Comments Before Responding

Read the editor's decision letter and every reviewer comment carefully before you begin. Identify which comments are mandatory, which are suggestions, and where reviewers disagree. Take notes on each point.

Be Respectful and Specific

Thank the reviewers for their time, even when you disagree. In your response letter, address each comment point by point, citing the page and line where you made a change. If you cannot make a requested change, explain why clearly and respectfully, with evidence.

Track Every Change

Revise the manuscript with Track Changes so reviewers can see exactly what you altered. Provide a clean version as well. Consistency between your response letter and the manuscript is essential.

Edit the Revised Manuscript

Revision is also a chance to improve language and clarity. Reviewers often comment on writing quality, so a careful edit strengthens your case. Our editors can review your revised manuscript and response letter together.

Resubmit on Time

Missed deadlines can delay or jeopardise your submission. Plan your revision timeline and submit before the deadline.

Get Support

Whether you are revising a journal article or a research paper, professional editing helps you present a polished, responsive revision.

Get Revision Support